Molcas Forum

Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Welcome to the Molcas forum. You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".

#1 2019-04-12 13:04:01

Leo Gaspard
Member
Registered: 2019-04-12
Posts: 2

[SOLVED] XField not taken into account

Hello everyone,

I am trying to run embedded cluster calculations as explained here

But I figured out that removing the XField from my input did not change the SCF results at all, so I guess that the SEWARD does not take in account the charges. Here's my input :

&SEWARD
BSSH
CHOLesky

Basis set
Ir.ANO-RCC-VTZP
Ir1	0.00000000    0.00000000    0.00000000  angstrom
end of basis

Basis set
O.ANO-RCC-VTZP
O1     0.00000000    0.00000000   -2.05711000 angstrom 
O2    -1.08652000   -1.65583000    0.00000000 angstrom
O3     1.65583000   -1.08652000    0.00000000 angstrom
O4    -1.65582000    1.08652000    0.00000000 angstrom
O5     1.08651000    1.65582000    0.00000000 angstrom
O6     0.00000000    0.00000000    2.05711000 angstrom
end of basis

Basis set 
Sr.ECP.leo.0s.0s.0e-AIMP-SrO.  / PSEUD_EMBED
Sr1   0.00000000   -2.74234000   -1.91600000 angstrom
Sr2  -2.74234000    0.00000000   -1.91600000 angstrom
Sr3   0.00000000    2.74233000   -1.91600000 angstrom
Sr4   0.00000000    0.00000000   -4.53344000 angstrom
Sr5   2.74233000    0.00000000   -1.91600000 angstrom
Sr6   0.00000000    2.74233000    1.91600000 angstrom
Sr7   2.74233000    0.00000000    1.91600000 angstrom
Sr8   0.00000000   -2.74234000    1.91600000 angstrom
Sr9   0.00000000    0.00000000    4.53344000 angstrom
Sr10  -2.74234000    0.00000000    1.91600000 angstrom
end of basis

Basis set 
Mg.ECP.leo.0s.0s.0e-AIMP-MgO.       / PSEUD_EMBED
Ir2  -2.74234000   -2.74234000    0.00000000 angstrom
Ir3   2.74233000   -2.74234000    0.00000000 angstrom
Ir4  -2.74234000    2.74233000    0.00000000 angstrom
Ir5   2.74233000    2.74233000    0.00000000 angstrom
end of basis 

XField
278 Angstrom -1 
-1.65582000   -7.14050000   -6.44945000   -1.00000 0. 0. 0.
 1.65582000    7.14050000   -6.44945000   -1.00000 0. 0. 0.
-2.74234000   -8.22701000   -2.05711000   -1.42857 0. 0. 0.
...
2.74234000    8.22701000   -2.05711000   -1.42857 0. 0. 0.
-2.74234000   -8.22701000   -4.53344000    0.88889 0. 0. 0.
 2.74234000    8.22701000   -4.53344000    0.88889 0. 0. 0.
 1.08651000   -6.57119000   -6.44945000   -1.00000 0. 0. 0.
-1.08651000    6.57119000   -6.44945000   -1.00000 0. 0. 0.
end of input   

Does anyone have any idea of what is happening ?


I tried using GATEWAY before the SEWARD, but as I'm using AIMP and ECP, the SEWARD won't run

Offline

#2 2019-04-12 13:38:34

Ignacio
Administrator
From: Uppsala
Registered: 2015-11-03
Posts: 504

Re: [SOLVED] XField not taken into account

Maybe it's because you specified the multipole order to -1, which means no permanent multipoles, so the charges were not even read. Try with 0 or 1.

Offline

#3 2019-04-16 12:46:23

Leo Gaspard
Member
Registered: 2019-04-12
Posts: 2

Re: [SOLVED] XField not taken into account

Thanks a lot it worked !

I thought that setting -1 meant "only charges", my mistake

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

Last refresh: Today 05:52:37